Compliance Stuff

Following the Supreme Court of the United States’ April 2024 ruling in  Muldrow v. City of St. Louis , employers have grappled with determining what constitutes an adverse employment action that will support a claim under federal antidiscrimination laws. A  recent decision  from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit offers some guidance in the context of job reassignments or transfers. Quick Hits In  Herkert v. Bisignano , No. 24-1420 (August 14, 2025), the Fourth Circuit found that, depending on the circumstances, a job reassignment may be an adverse employment action under the Supreme Court’s  Muldrow  standard. While finding that an employee’s acceptance of a new position does not necessarily mean that the change was voluntary, the Fourth Circuit declined to hold that  any  loss of supervisory authority would constitute “an actionable ‘disadvantageous change’ in employment status.” Employers may need to be prepared to explain and de...